Assessing Practitioners’ and Patients’ Needs Regarding Shared Decision-Making and Decision Aids

نویسندگان

  • Chaitanya Mudgal Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • David Ring Chief Orthopaedic Hand Service, Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, USA
  • Jeroen Bossen Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • Michiel Hageman Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • Science Variation Group Abzug M. Joshua, Julie Adams, Gallo Fabio Arbelaez, T. Aspard, George W. Balfour, Brent H. Bamberger, Jose Camilo Barreto Romero, Michael Baskies, Arnnold W. Batson, Taizoon Baxamusa, Ramón De Bedout, Steven Beldner, Prosper Benhaim, Leon Benson, Jorge G. Boretto, Martin Boyer, Gregory Byrd Dee, Ryan P. Calfee, Cecilia Gladys Caro Zambrano, Charles Cassidy, Louis III Catalano, Karel Chivers, Ralph M. Costanzo, Phani Dantuluri, Gregory DeSilva, Seth Dodds, John P. Evans, Luis Felipe Náquira Escobar, C.H. Fernandes, Thomas J. Fischer, Jochen Fischer, Renato M. Fricker, Gary K. Frykman, Aida E. Garcia, Glenn R. Gaston, Fernando José Giovanni Di, Charles A. Goldfarb, Michael W. Grafe, H.W. Grunwald, Warren C. Hammert, Randy Hauck, Ricardo German Hernandez, Eric Hofmeister, Richard L. Hutchison, Asif Ilyas, Jonathan Isaacs, Sidney M. Jacoby, Peter Jebson, Christopher M. Jones, Michael Jones, Sanjeev Kakar, David M. Kalainov, Kaplan D. Thomas, Saul Kaplan, Leonid Katolik, Stephen A. Kennedy, Michael W. Kessler, Hervey L. Kimball, G.A. Kraan, Paul A. Martineau, John McAuliffe, Steven J. McCabe, Desirae M. McKee, Greg Merrell, Charles Metzger, Michael Nancollas, David L. Nelson, Ralf Nyszkiewicz, Jose A. Ortiz, Patrick W. Owens, Jason M. Palmer, Lior Paz, Gary M. Pess, Daniel Polatsch, J. Frank Raia, Marc J. Richard, Marco Rizzo, Rozental, David Ruchelsman, Oleg M. Semenkin, Javier Francisco Sierra Aguilar, Todd Siff, Samir Sodha, Catherine Spath, Sander Spruijt, Thomas G. Stackhouse, Carrie Swigart, Robert M. Szabo, John Taras, Jason D. Tavakolian, Andrew L. Terrono, Thomas F. Varecka, Abhijeet L. Wahegaonkar, Christopher J. Walsh, Frank L. Walter, Lawrence Weiss, Brian P.D Wills, Chris Wilson, Christopher J. Wilson, Jennifer Wolf Moriatis, Megan M. Wood, Colby Young.
  • Valentin Neuhaus Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
چکیده مقاله:

       Background: As part of the process of developing a decision aid for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, we were interested in the level of ‘decisional conflict’ of hand surgeons and patients with CTS. This study addresses the null hypothesis that there is no difference between surgeon and patient decisional conflict with respect to test and treatment options for CTS. Secondary analyses assess the impact of patient and physician demographics and the strength of the patient-physician relationship on decisional conflict.   Methods: One-hundred-twenty-three observers of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) and 84 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome completed a survey regarding the Decisional Conflict Scale. Patients also filled out the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Patient Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9).   Results: On average, patients had significantly greater decision conflict and scored higher on most subscales of the decisional conflict scale than hand surgeons.Factors associated with greater decision conflict were specific hand surgeon, less self-efficacy (confidence that one can achieve one’s goals in spite of pain), and higher PDRQ (relationship between patient and doctor). Surgeons from Europe have--on average--significantly more decision conflict than surgeons in the United States of America.   Conclusions: Patients with CTS have more decision conflict than hand surgeons. Decision aids might help narrow this gap in decisional conflict.  

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

assessing practitioners’ and patients’ needs regarding shared decision-making and decision aids

background: as part of the process of developing a decision aid for carpal tunnel syndrome (cts) according to the ottawa decision support framework, we were interested in the level of ‘decisional conflict’ of hand surgeons and patients with cts. this study addresses the null hypothesis that there is no difference between surgeon and patient decisional conflict with respect to test and treatment...

متن کامل

Shared decision making and patient decision aids in dermatology.

Shared decision making combines individual patient interests and values with clinical best evidence under the guiding principle of patient autonomy. Patient decision aids can support shared decision making and facilitate decisions that have multiple options with varying outcomes for which patients may attribute different values. Given the variable psychosocial impact of skin disease on individu...

متن کامل

Shared decision-making and patient decision AIDS: is it time?

The quality and cost of medical care is determined in large part by the decisions that clinicians and patients make every day about seeking care, having tests, starting treatments, and stopping treatments. There are situations in medicine in which a treatment or approach has considerable evidence of significant benefit with minimal or no harm. High-quality decisions in these situations are abou...

متن کامل

The potential for shared decision-making and decision aids in rehabilitation medicine.

OBJECTIVE Shared decision-making and the use of decision aids are increasingly promoted in various healthcare settings. The extent of their current use and potential in rehabilitation medicine is unknown. The aim of the present study was to explore the barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making and use of decision aids in daily practice, and to explore the perceptions of physical an...

متن کامل

Shared Decision Making Supported by Patient Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment

El cáncer de próstata es un problema importante para los hombres mayores en países desarrollados. Las decisiones acerca del screening y tratamiento del cáncer de próstata se caracterizan por múltiples opciones razonables que parecen “arriesgadas”, donde las preferencias personales de los pacientes son importantes. Se va reconociendo de modo creciente la toma de decisión compartida entre el paci...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ذخیره در منابع من قبلا به منابع من ذحیره شده

{@ msg_add @}


عنوان ژورنال

دوره 4  شماره 2

صفحات  150- 155

تاریخ انتشار 2016-04-01

با دنبال کردن یک ژورنال هنگامی که شماره جدید این ژورنال منتشر می شود به شما از طریق ایمیل اطلاع داده می شود.

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023